11.29.2011

Droit des affaires 21.11.11

L'application dsitributive s'applique tout d'abors pour déterminer la juridiction compétente. La compétence matérielle est faite selon la qualité du défendeur. Le commerçant doit assigner la personne civile devant un tribunal civil? En revanche, la jurisprudence accorde au non-commerçant qui assigne un commerçant une option entre le tribunal de commerce et le tribunal civil. En ce qui concerne les clauses attributives de competence au profit des tribunaux de commerce, la Cour de cassation considère que la clause est valable en matière d'actes mixtes mais qu'elle est inopposable aux non-commerçants.



L'application distributive s'applique aussi en matière de preuves. Le principe est simple, les preuves du droit commercial diffèrent du droit civil ( preuve est libre en droit commercial par exemple). Pour déterminer s'il faut aplliquer les règles de preuve du droit commercial ou du droit civil, il faut regarder la qualité de celui contre qui la preuve est faite. Si le supermarché veut prouver que l'on a pas payé, preuve exigée si achat de plus de 1500 euros ( ke client pourra priuver comme il le souhaite pour montrer le défaut de livraison). Peu importe la preuve choisie, il n'y a pas de lien necessaire entre le mode de preuve et le tribunal choisi ou compétent.



B L'application unitaire ou exclusive du droit civil



L'art 48 du code de ptocedure civil interdit ttes clauses qui derogent aux regles de compétences territoriales à l'égard des non-commerçants. Mais les clauses compromissoires peuvent être valables dans les acares mixtes.



C Application du droit de la consommation



De plus en plus dactes mixtes echappent au droit civil et commercial pour être soumis aux règles impératives du droit de la consommation. Peu importe pour el consommateur le statut du professionnel avec le quel il contracte. Depuis 2008, les actes mixtes se prescrivent par 5 ans comme les actes de commerce ou les actes civils. Cette prescription quiquennale connait toutefois des exceptions. Exemple : Art L-137.2 du code la conso



Chap 2 La distinction entre le commerçant et les autres professionnels





Section I Le statut de commerçant



I Les conditions de la qualité de commerçant



La faculté de devenir commerçant est ouverte à tout individu. Le droit des affaires est en effet dominé par les principes de liberté du commerce et de l(inductrie ( art 7 du décret d'alarme 1791). Ce principe a été conforté par la loi Lechapelier de 1791 qui a aboli les corporations. Liberté du commerce : tte personne a la liberté d'entreprendre et d'exploiter librement son entreprise. La loi royer 73 : La liberté d'entreprendre est un des fondements des activités commerciale et artisanale. Le conseil constitutionnel, allant plus loi, a posé le principe que la liberté d'entreprendre est une regle à valeur constitutionnel, c'est une liberté publique (- 16 janvier 82). En prztique, la liberté d'entreprendre connait des limites en dépit de ce principe..le legislateur peut la restreindre pour la concilier avec d'autres principes fondamentaux ou d'autres intérets. Liberté d'entreprendre a des restrictions légales qui concernent l'activité exercée ou la personne du commerçant. Pour etre commerçants, il fzut don reunir plusieurs conditions.



A L'accomplissement d'un acet de commerce à titre de profession habituel



Cette condition est posée par la loi, l'art L-121.1 dit que sont commerçants ceux qui font des acvets de commerce dans le cadre de leur profession habituelle.



1 L'exerccie d'acte de commerce



Certains sont commerçants à des personnes qui n'accomplissent pas d'actes de commerce :

  • les asscoiés en nom collectif



2 Une activité professionnelleS




Exposé Lobbies

INTERESTS GROUPS AND LOBBYING



Plan



Introduction : Définition – What is lobbying ?

I – First origins of lobbying and the legal framework

A – Origins : wait in the halls

B – A fruitless attempt to regulate lobbying


II – Lobbies at the heart of the American society
A – General information and classification of lobbies

B – The National Riffle Association, a lobby deeply ingrained in the US way of life


Conclusion : corruption





What is lobbying?

To lobby means to influence or persuade public officials to take a desired action, usually to pass (or defeat) legislation. An effective lobbyist is convincing and persuasive at selling an idea. Originally, the word suggested someone who waited in the halls or lobbies to talk with legislators. A lobbyist's effectiveness today still depends on being at the right place at the right time. Timing and knowledge are both critical to an effective lobbyist. A lobby can represent an industry, a punctual industries coalition, an association or a trade union.

Generally to become a member of a lobby, you have to pay a contribution that allow you to have a member card that give you access to conference...

A lobby is organized as any industry with a president, an executive vice president, an assistant secretary...

In American politics, most lobbyist organizations are headquartered on or near Washington DC. In fact, more than 6,000 lobbies and 25,000 lobbyists are registered at Washington DC! And similar system exists in the 50 other States...



I – First origins of lobbying and the legal framework



A – Origins : wait in the halls



Organized lobbying of American politicians goes back at least as far as the late 18th Century, getting involved in the earliest days of Congress. As early as 1792, just three years after the Constitution was adopted, William Hull was hired by the Virginia veterans of the Continental army to lobby for additional compensation for their war services. Hull wrote to other veterans' groups, recommending that they have their "agent or agents" cooperate with him during the next session to pass a compensation bill. In 1795, a Philadelphia newspaper described the way lobbyists waited outside Congress Hall to "give a hint to a Member, teaze or advise as may best suit."




B – A fruitless attempt to regulate lobbying

The ability to lobby the government is protected by the right to petition in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The first attempt to regulate lobbying came in 1928 where the Senate enacted a bill requiring lobbyists to register with the secretary of the Senate and clerk of the House. However, the House of Representatives blocked the idea, and despite notable scandals no further legislative action on lobbying was proposed until after the Second World War.

Eighteen years after the Senate’s original attempt, Congress adopted the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act of 1946. United State v. Harris was a famous Supreme Court case which applied directly the Regulation of Lobbying Act.

This act defined a lobbyist as any person "who by himself, or through any agent or employee or other persons in any manner whatsoever, directly or indirectly, solicits, collects, or receives money or any other thing of value to be used principally . . . to influence, directly or indirectly, the passage or defeat of any legislation by the Congress of the United States." In other words, it means that the act applies only to paid lobbyists who directly communicate with members of Congress on pending or proposed federal legislation. This means that lobbyists who visit with congressional staff members rather than members of Congress themselves are not considered lobbyists.

Anyone meeting this description was required to register name, address, salary, and expenses with the secretary of the Senate and the clerk of the House, and to file quarterly reports on funds received or spent, "to whom and for what purpose" those funds were paid, "the names of newspapers and magazines in which the lobbyist 'caused to be published' articles or editorials," and the proposed legislation the lobbyist was employed to support or oppose.

Lobbyists were also required to keep detailed accounts of all contributions of five hundred dollars or more made to members of Congress. Criminal penalties were assigned for any violation of this act.




Then, the Congress passed the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 that confirms this first piece of legislation.




The Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2006 was passed by the Congress. It obliges lobbyists to report on contributions and put a limit on contributions.




Next, was passed The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007. It adds again restrictions to contributions and strengthens public disclosure requirements concerning lobbying activity.




The Executive Branch Reform Act was a bill which would have required over 8,000 Executive Branch officials to report into a public database nearly any "significant contact" from any "private party. It added that anyone who contacts a covered government official is in effect deemed to be a lobbyist. The bill defines "significant contact" to be any "oral or written communication (including electronic communication)”. A lot of people statute that this is a real infringement on right to petition by making it impossible for citizens to communicate their views on controversial issues without having their names and viewpoints entered into a government database.

Finally, Obama in his early days as President signed two executive orders and three presidential memoranda to ensure his administration would be a more open, transparent, and accountable government. Obama's new lobbying rules will ban aides from trying to influence the administration when they leave his staff. The rules also ban lobbyists from giving gifts of any size to any member of his administration. This was completed on May 2009, by a Recovery Act Lobbying Rules.

The existence of legislation, specifically related to lobbyists and lobbying, illustrates how important public affairs is within American politics. Senator William Byrd, in an enlightening speech on the history of Washington lobbying, admitted that modern Congressmen could not adequately consider (their) work load without them.” It appears that whatever happens, lobbying is here to stay.

This legal framework has many loopholes which are immediately used.



II – Lobbies at the heart of the American society



A – General information and classification of lobbies



To reach their political aims, Americans gather into associations. A famous study on political culture called Almond's and Verba, realized in 1963 in five countries, confirmed it for the 20th century. There are more persons who joined associations in United States than in GB, Germany, Italy or Mexico. 57% of Americans recognized that they are joined to an association whereas only 47% in Great Britain; 44% in Germany, 29% in Italy, and only 25% in Mexico.

This study also shows that Americans are more inclined than others to use lobby to intent to influence the government, locally or nationally. Someone said that « the adhesion to an organization, politic or not, is linked to an elevation of the competence level and the degree of activity of the people ».



Besides, we have to know that between 1980 and 1996, five hundred new organizations were born, in the trade, agriculture, environment, health, education, culture, social welfare, and leisure. Two categories didn't progress: trade union and students associations.



Moreover, interest groups continued to evolve during the 1990's: each week, ten new organizations were created.



The number of interest groups at the local level can't be determined. Most of them are related to very specific local problems, and can be born and disappear in the same year.

In spite of these restrictions, we can estimate the number of the American political organizations, at the local or national level, to two hundred thousands.




The top sectors of interest groups between 1998 and 2010 were:


Client
Amount Spent

1
Finance, Insurance &Real Estate
$4,274,060,331

2
Health
$4,222,427,808

3
Misc Business
$4,149,842,571

4
Communications/Electronics
$3,497,881,399

5
Energy &Natural Resources
$3,104,104,518

6
Transportation
$2,245,118,222

7
Other
$2,207,772,363

8
Ideological/Single-Issue
$1,477,294,241

9
Agribusiness
$1,280,824,983

10
Defense
$1,216,469,173

11
Construction
$480,363,108

12
Labor
$427,355,408

13
Lawyers &Lobbyists
$336,170,306








There are so many organized lobbies today, representing numerous segments of society and addressing such a wide range of issues, that the distinction between "special interests" and those of the American people may no longer be valid. In a sense, interest groups are the American people.

Interest groups can be grouped into several broad categories:

First category: the Economic interest groups (that encompass business,trade and professional interest groups)

The Economic interest group is certainly the largest category. It is interest groups formed by merchants, creditors, business owners and other commerce related organizations. Their goal is to promote business interest.

Economic interest groups include organizations that represent big business. Large corporations and individual unions also have offices in the capital.

Besides, trade associations are also considered as "Business Interest Groups": Trade associations represent entire industries.

Professionals also form interest groups: the professions are generally defined as those occupations that require extensive and specialized training, such as medicine, law and teaching.

For each categories of interest groups, each time we're gonna focus on one specific association as an example.

Here, we are going to watch an extract of the movie “Super Size Me” realized in 2004 by Morgan Spurlock concerning one of the biggest agribusiness lobby the Grocery Manufacturers Association. Since 1908, GMA has been representing the world's largest branded food, beverage and consumer product companies. In doing this GMA has been an advocate for its members in public policy and has been at the forefront on initiatives to increase efficiency industrywide. EXTRACT

Second category: Public interest groups

Public interest groups are different than the other groups because they don't just seek benefits for their members but for the entire public. However, the activists who staff these groups gain financially by attracting donations from individuals and foundations who support their activities. As the name implies, public interest groups enjoy an image of non-partisanship, even if some of them engage in clearly political activities.

Perhaps the best known is: the League of Women Voters (LWV): which promotes simplified voting procedures and an informed electorate, founded in 1920. It began as a "mighty political experiment" aimed to help newly-enfranchised women exercise their responsibilities as voters. The league has approximately 150,000 members (as of 2006). The actual president is Elizabeth McNamara.

Third category: Government interest groups

Because of the structure of the federal system, it is not surprising that there are organizations to bring the issues of local and state government before Congress and the administration. One critical duty performed by these groups is to help states and local governments get federal grants. These funds are important because it's a central means in which states get back money taken away through federal taxes.

Here, let's talk about: The National League of Cities (NLC): The National League of Cities is an American advocacy organization representing 19,000 cities, towns, and villages, and including 49 state municipal leagues. It provides training to municipal officials, holds conferences, lobbies and provides assistance to cities in educational issues. The actual president is James E. Mitchell Jr.

Forth category: Religious interest groups

The separation of church and state does not prohibit religious interest groups from lobbying; indeed, it is safe to say that all religious groups are involved in politics to some degree. These groups try to influence public policy in religious matters.

Let's look at The Christian Coalition: It is more supported by conservative Protestants, it has an agenda that includes support for school prayer, opposition to homosexual rights, and a constitutional amendment banning abortion (avortement). In 2006, it stated that its membership was two point five million supporters. The actual president is Roberta Combs.

Fifth category: Civil rights interest groups

It is groups that historically have faced legal discrimination and, in many respects, continue to lack equal opportunity. Their interest involve more than civil right, it encompasses social welfare, immigration policy, affirmative action, a variety of gender issues, and political action.

Here, we choose to focus on: the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF): The Task Force is the country’s first social justice organization fighting to improve the lives of Lesbian, Gay, bisexual and transgender people, and working to create positive, perpetual change and opportunity for all. It was founded in 1973. The executive director is Rea Carrey.




Sixth category: Ideological interest groups

Ideological interest groups view all issues through the lens of their political ideology, typically liberal or conservative. Their support for legislation or policy depends exclusively on whether they find it ideologically sound. Ideological Groups are often associated with extreme political currents.

Let's focus on: Americans for Democratic Action (ADA): ADA works for social and economic justice through lobbying, grassroots organizing, research and supporting progressive candidates. It was created in 1947. It has actually 65,000 members and the actual president is: Lynn Woosley.

Seventh category: Agricultural Groups:

These interest groups look after the interest of farmers and the government's agricultural policy.

The National Farmers Union: The National Farmers Union was founded in 1902. Its aim is to protect and enhance the economic well-being and quality of life for family farmers and ranchers and their rural communities. It does this by promoting legislation and education beneficial to farmers, and by developing cooperative buying and selling methods and businesses. The current president is Roger Johnson.




Eighth category: Labor Union Groups:

A labor union is an organization of workers who share the same type of job or who work in the same industry. Organized labor generally speaks with one voice on such social welfare and job related matters such as Social Security programs, minimum wages and unemployment.

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations is made up of 56 national and international unions, together representing more than 11 million workers. It was formed in 1955. The actual president is Richard Trumka.




Ninth category: Promote the Welfare:

A number of interest groups seek to promote the welfare of minority groups in America.

Let's focus on: the National Association for the Advencement of Colored People (NAACP): formed in 1909. Its mission is "to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate racial hatred and racial discrimination". It has three hundred thousands members. The actual president is Benjamin Jealous.




Tenth category: Promote Causes:

A large number of groups exist to promoting or opposing a certain cause. Examples of these groups include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Women's Political Caucus, National Rifle Association which is very famous.



B – The National Riffle Association, a lobby deeply ingrained in the US way of life



As an introduction, let's look at an extract from the movie Bowling for Columbine EXTRACT 49min nombre de morts

45min Marylin Manson campagne de peur → The NRA is fuelled by a campaign of fear.

The NRA, or National Rifle Association, is an American non-profit organization originally established in 1871 in New York that helps to protect gun owners and ensure they are able to exercise their right to bear arms. According to the Second Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, citizens are afforded the right to purchase and own guns. There are currently over four million members of the NRA, and statistics show that this number is steadily growing. The organization also promotes gun shooting skills and self-defense, as well as the ability to own guns and use them as a means for self-defense.

For us, it can be difficult to understand why possession of firearm is so essential in the USA. But for American citizens it is in their nature. According to them and the Constitution, a man can be free only if he can bear arm. It constitutes a real civil right as the freedom of movement.

Let's focus on a extract from the movie “Bowling for Columbine” realized by Michael Moore in 2002. This is a speech of the former president of the NRA, Charlton Heston, who came in Denver, the city where just ten days before the notorious massacre of Columbine happened.

EXTRACT 33m50 Charlon Heston







Corruption

As a conclusion, we can tell that Lobbying is a constitutional right, regulation is insufficient and some lobbies go too far.

One could argue that lobbying is a just a special form of corruption focused on legislative bodies or some other rule-making agency. In fact, lobbying is modeled as monetary transfers from lobbyists to politicians and these transfers could equally be interpreted as campaign contributions or bribes. In other words, lobbying can be a substitute for, or a complement to, corruption. However, the difference between corruption and lobbying is that with lobbying, firms can get politicians to change the rules to their advantage, while by bribing bureaucrats, firms can only hope to stop the latter from enforcing the rules.

There are some striking example that perfectly illustrate how the line is blurred between lobbying and corruption.

One widely-used tool is the junket, a trip for legislators paid by the lobby. Congressional junkets between 2005 and today were estimated to $14 million.

Some lobbies are very powerful and exert strong pressure by being able to mobilize enough votes to unseat a member of Congress if he or she votes against what the lobby wants.



11.28.2011

Exposé De Valentine, Ludivine et Angélina ( Part 2)

Part 2

B Freedom of religion in the American's mind

Freedom of religion is one of the indirect result of the emancipation of the American society and culture from Britain. So, it is a typical point of the American identity. Americans are very open-minded as far as the religion is concerned. As a matter of fact, There is a freedom to pray at work or in school as long as it doesn't bother the functioning of the office or the class. Moreover, the Americans have accepted the fact that people can wear religious signs freely wherever they want, it is never forbidden.
Generally, Americans are conscious of their freedom and they defend it. But, some of them can be considered as " against" the freedom of religion. We noticed it especially during the affair of the ground zero mosque. The next video illustrates this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbiSmADGY9o

    • Thanks to this video, you can see that in spite of the freedom of religion, every religions are not all accepted, some Americans don't want to accept them all. There is still in the USA a predominance of Christians, creating a kind of norm to follow. That's why the coexistence of the different religions is not always easy within the population. Besides, being atheist is sometimes frowned. And according to Mother Jones, 52% of Americans claim they would not vote for an atheist as president, even if he or she is well-qualified.
      This fact, which is established in the American' society's mind show a certain limit of the principle of the freedom of religion, as explained in the first amendment.
      II In reality: failure in the absolutism of this principleEquality is very important in the USA. Alexis de Tocqueville wrote about it in his book Democracy in America. So, it is very important to link equality to the principle of freedom of religion. We'll see if it exists a relation between religions and the state ( A) and then, we'll study the situation of different minorities ( B).
    • A Relations between the state and religion.The section one of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits discrimination, including on the basis of religion, by securing "the equal protection of the laws" for every person. Is is also directly linked to the “ wall of sepraration” advocated first by Thomas Jefferson, that is to say the sepraration between religion and the state. USA makes part of the countries that are based on the separation between Chuch and State, between religion and state more generally. This is not always true because in the USA, The President doesn't hesitate to say " God bless you" for example. That would never happen in France but in the USA, it is accepted. In spite of this separation between religions and state, there are some conflicts between the two of them sometimes. For instance, As far as the free exercice clause is concerned, the Court found that a law prohibiting polygamy that had been challenged by a Mormon defendant was constitutional, even though his religion allows it in the lawsuit Reynolds v USA in 1878. In another case, it was decided that the Amish do not have to send their children to school to the age of 16 as we required by the state where the person is question lived. Amish children are often educated at home after a certain age.

To conserve the freedom and the equality about religion, people had to struggle sometimes and to claim their rights. Moreover, there are a lot of conflicts about this topic that is quitte touchy. That's why there were several other litigations part from the ones concerning the proper State. To respect the establishment clause, the Court has held that praying in public school classes in the lawsuit Engel v Vitale in 1962 is unconstitutional. Also was held a violation of the Establishment Clause the display of a nativity scene inside a government building in Alleghency County v Aclu in 1989. These issues are very delicater, particularly in a country where religion has much importance. In a recent case the Supreme Court stepped a very important question of knowing if, the American pledge of Allegiance wich is generally cited by Children in the public school system, the words " one nation, one god" are against the establishment clause. A father brought the case in front of the Court. The court of appeals decided in 2002 that the phrase " under god" did constitute anendorsement of religion and was conqequently in violation of the Establishment clause. The Supreme court accepted the case but did not rule on the constitutionality of the phrase. Furthermore, it has already been established since 1943 that no one can be forced to salute the flag or say the Pledge of Allegiance if it violates the individual's conscience.


With those litigations, State tries to put a limit to religions. Indeed, human sacrifices is a pratice of some religions but it is definitely forbidden in the USA.


B. Coexistence between the different religions: the problem of equality.

There are several minorities in America but this Amendment allows them to be free.
Native American children were sent to Christian boarding schools where they were forced to worship the Christian God and traditional customs were banned. Until the Freedom of Religion Act of 1978, "spiritual leaders [of Native Americans] ran the risk of jail sentences of up to 30 years for simply practicing their rituals. The traditional indigenous Sun Dance was illegal from the 1880s (Canada) or 1904 (USA) to the 1980s. Now, this discrimination disappears but The eagle feather law (Title 50 Part 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations) stipulates that only individuals of certifiable Native American ancestry enrolled in a federally recognized tribe are legally authorized to obtain eagle feathers for religious or spiritual use. This law only recognized 769 tribes, but there are many more that the government won’t recognize because once they become recognized, they are tax-free.

Let’s talk about some of the most well-know communities:

Historically, the Latter Day Saint movement, from which would later rise Mormonism, has been the victim of religious violence beginning with reports by founder Joseph Smith immediately after his First Vision 1820 and continuing as the movement grew and migrated from its inception in western New York to Ohio, Missouri, and Illinois. The violence culminated when Smith was assassinated by a mob of 200 men in Carthage Jail in 1844. With the concept of plural marriage, from 1830 to 1890 the Mormon faith allowed its members to practice polygamy. Today, Mormons are accepted. They live seperated from the society but they're allowed to practice their religion like they want. Indeed, polygamy is still a common practice in their communities and the children are raised up in their families or in specialized schools. For example, Mormons have to respect a health code, which prohibits alcohol, drugs, coffee or tea and they have to respect their vow of chastity until their marriage.

The Amish is a religious community, which is very strict. There are over 250,000 Amish today and the number is still increasing. Their members have to be very modest. They live without technology and actually work very hard every day. They wear the same type of clothes farmers would have worn in the 19th Century. They cannot use cars so they ride horses or use a buggy. Having children, raising them and socialization with neighbors and relatives are the main functions of the Amish family.

The Muslim people sometimes have a bad image in the public opinion because they tend to be associated with Islamists. This problem has gotten bigger after 911. Recently, there was a big controversy on whether there should be a mosque near Ground Zero or not. Barack Obama was in favor of this project but the opponents were too many and it was abandoned. American Muslims do not feel as marginalized as in Europe, though.



Let's evoke the atheists that are almost always forgotten when we talk about religion. In the USA, there are 24 million of atheists, that is to say 8%. They're legally protected against discrimination. They were the first lawyers for the principle of separation between state and religion. The Courts have regularly protected the freedom of the atheists. Indeed, atheists sum up the situation saying " Freedom of religion means also the absence of religion". In the verdict of the Grumet v. Kyrias joel, the judge has even written that government shouldn't prefer a religion to another but also not a religion to an absence of religion. Atheists are almost alxays forgotten in laws concerning freedom of religion. Discrimination is admitted when there is a religion, not when there is not. Moreover, Arkansas and South Carolina forbid atheists to organize public meetings. But, The court of appeals decided in 2002 that the phrase " under god" did constitute anendorsement of religion and was conqequently in violation of the Establishment clause. Atheism is also respected and taken in count in the American society.

Also, let's note that sects are not a touchy topic in the USA. It is not forbidden like in France and it is almost trendy.
We can think of the scientology: here in France, it is considered as a sect but it cannot be forbidden because we have to respect the freedom of association. In the US, it was recognized as a religion in 1993. We can find scientology churches everywhere (like in the middle of Times Square). There are even many ads for the Mormons.
Some celebrities are even publically a part of these communities: Tom Cruise and John Travolta are members of the Scientology, Stephenie Meyer (the author of Twilight) is a Mormon.

To conclude, freedom of religion is a plinth of the American society. It expresses the freedom and the equality that remain in the USA and Americans themselves are really attached to this Amendment and to their right to choose whatever religion they want.




Exposé de Valentine, Ludivine et Angélina

Freedom of religion (Part 1)



Introduction


In his book, The two sources of moral and religion published in 1932, Henri Bergson wrote " There has never been a society without religion". That's why, no matter the period, men had always to organize their societies taking in count religions. Indeed, We talk about religion in plural because there can be several ones in one society notably in the countries where the principle of the separation of Church and State was adopted. Besides, this is this principle that developed the idea of freedom of religion. Rules are needed for religions not to be in a kind of competition. Each country tries to set up rules to keep their country peaceful in spite of the diversity of religions. Without those rules, a sort of war of religion could break out. In the USA, the first admendment of the Constitution protects different freedoms but especially the freedom of religion. It protects it thanks to two principles :The first one is the " Establishment Clause". Governments may not favor any religion over others, and may not favor religion over non-religion. For example, any law giving advantages to a religion or religion in general will generally be considered unconstituional. So, this principle guarantees freedom but also equality between religions. The second principle is found in the "Free exercice Clause". It is generally understood to mean that one is allowed to believe in any set of beliefs that one wishes, no matter how outrageous the belief seem to others. Now, several questions can be asked. What importance does freedom of religion have in the United States of America? How is it managed? In a first part, we'll see that this principle is constitutionally guaranteed before studying, in a second part, the actual failure of the application of this principle.



    I A principle recognized in the Constitution of the United States



It is common to say that the USA is the country of freedom, we say that particularly thanks to their first admendment what's the position of the Supreme Court ? (A) This first admendment directly results from the American culture but how do they live with this principle ? (B)



A The position of the Supreme Court : How does it apply this first admendment that hallows the principle of freedom ?



In the lawsuit of 2006 named Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, the Supreme Court judged that members from a Christian sect could be allowed to drink halluninogenic tea, the hoasca, because it was part of their brazilian practices. This lawsuit is quite striking because in 1990, the Supre Court, in another lawsuit named Employment Div. Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, it had decided to forbid ameadians to use peyotl even though that was part of their religious practices. In those lawsuits, the Supreme Court had to interpret the free exercice clause and the establishment clause. The Supreme Court's decisions concerning the freedom of practicing religion had been adopted very differently so far. Indeed, the Supreme Court can have a large or a struct interpretation of the two clauses that constitute the freedom of religion. Through different cases, we can notice an evolution of the Supreme Court's position. For instance, in 1878, there was the famous Reynolds case. A mormon was not allowed to have several wives. Then, the compelling interest test case of 1963 reinforces the sepration between the State and religion. In spite of this, in 1990, an ameradian man is condamned as he consumed peyotl even though it made part of his religious practices. Finally, there was this case of the hallucinogenic tea where the use of this tea was allowed. So, we can notice that the Supreme Court can have different interpretations of the clauses. Actually, it usually tries to make things evolve so that religions can be all practiced in a free and equal way.